Tag Archives: Saul Alinsky

Alinskyian agitators stir discontent in Ferguson, Missouri

Lay Catholic Logo
“…the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) has given MCU the following national grants: $25,000 (2007-2008); $30,000 (2008-2009); $30,000 (2009-2010); $40,000 (2010-2011); $45,000 (2011-2012); $55,000 (2012-2013).”
By Stephanie Block
Rev. Tracey Blackman, speaking on “webinar video” (below) about the Gamaliel Foundations’s activism in Ferguson,[i] said that the Gamaliel-involved clergy must be “protectors of the narrative” and that they would be the ones to tell what really happened in Ferguson.
In an era when media regularly “shape” the news for their own political ends, we understand what Rev. Blackman means by a “narrative.” The facts – that a young Missouri man, Michael Brown, was shot and killed by a policeman or that “communities of color” suffer disenfranchizement, disproportionate unemployment, and substandard education – are rarely presented in unadorned form.   They are “embroidered” with unsubstantiated claims.  One hears from one source that “Michael Brown was weaponless and unresisting” and from another that “Michael Brown had gunpowder on his hands.”  Eyewitnesses say he was shot despite having his hands in the air; eyewitness say he didn’t have his hands in the air.
 †
Gamaliel wants to be sure that its “narrative” is the one broadcast across the country – that Michael Brown was a victim of police brutality and a racist system that targets young black men.  This narrative counters another that would dismiss Michael Brown’s  neighborhood as violent, crime-riddled, disrespectful of the law, and trying to blame the police for its problems.
 †
In between these two “narratives” sits a frightened, long-suffering community with far more of its share of problems than anyone deserves.
  †
In true Alinskyian fashion, the Gamaliel Foundation is “rubbing raw the sores of discontent” to further its own ends.  On the webinar, Rev. Blackman says that violence not coming from the men of Michael Brown’s neighborhood but from outsiders.  That’s an important point to her – an example, she says, of what she means by “controlling the narrative.”
 †
Organizing the people of Michael Brown’s neighborhood for non-violent protest is also coming from “outsiders,” however.  The Gamaliel local in St. Louis, Metropolitan Congeregations United (MCU), staged a Call to Action – an “organized resistence” of people joining “those already standing in Ferguson” – during October 10-13, calling it a “Weekend of Resistence.”
People from around the country were asked to travel to Ferguson for an October 10 training in nonviolent resistence, in preparation for a march the following day.  Gamaliel’s National Campaign Director wrote after the event that: “Luminaries, old guard civil rights leaders, and out-of-state activists poured into St. Louis for the Mass Mobilization on Oct 11-13, wanting to participate in, or organize, what they may be deem to be the latest incarnation of the civil rights movement.”[ii]
Sunday, October 12 was designated as “Hands Up Sabbath.”  The clergy of “faith communities” were asked to address speak about the issues of police brutality and racism, using materials specially prepared by a coalition of groups that include another Alinskyian organzing network, PICO.  The  “Hands Up Sabbath Toolkit” contains “reflections” and prayers for congregational use, such as a liberationist “Prayer Patterned after the Lord’s Prayer” with the stunningly twisted and telling petition: “May our will be done on earth and in heaven and in the church in the United States.” [emphasis added.][iii]
 †
Then, on Monday, Gamaliel called for clergy-led civil disobedience, with the plan being that many would go to jail, presumably gaining national media coverage by the act.
 †
Lastly, protestors encouraged the signing of a national petition directed at local county executive candidates. [iv]  MCU’s – and Gamaliel’s – demands are that, whoever wins the election, will “within 30 days of taking office… hold a summit for the 90+ mayors of St. Louis County municipalities and all heads of law enforcement divisions. MCU wants the summit to focus on commitments from each mayor and police chief to implement community policing procedures, reform excessive traffic fines and abolishing the unjust debtor prison system, so that traffic violators, especially those of low income, are not being exploited to boost city coffers.”[v]
Debtor prison?  Boost city coffers?  Really?
 †
Gamaliel rhetoric is inflammatory and rousing.  One speaker on the webinar called the shooting of Michael Brown an act of genocide and that “Jesus was martryed in same manner as a lot of our black men… we have churches that are ready to get out there on the front line but other churches are ready to retreat and close their doors…as an organizer, I have to navigate that tension between those that are ready to be there.”
 †
Another, Rev. John Welch, chair of Gamaliel’s board of directors, said in response to a pointed question that it was not the role of clergy to be “peacemakers” but “developers of disturbance.”
 †
Is this a “narrative” that best serves a beleagured people or is there, perhaps, still another, yet to be explored?  Is there “good news” that clergy might carry, petitioning God’s will rather than Gamaliel’s?  Are there ways to help hurting people that don’t perpetuate structures of injustice?
 †
If Gamaliel were a purely secular political organization, such questions would make no sense.  As an organization with clergy among its leadership and that is funded by religious institutions,[vi] these questions are not merely reasonable – they are long overdue.
Stephanie Block also edits Los Pequenos – a newspaper based in New Mexico – and is the author of the four-volume ‘Change Agents: Alinskyian Organizing Among Religious Bodies’, which is available at Amazon.
 †
Note:
[i] Gamaliel webinar video, ““MCU and Gamaliel’s October Push for Ferguson” October 7, 2014: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgGE3gfJwcM&feature=youtu.be (accessed 10-15-14).  Link to the video appeared on the Gamaliel Foundation homepage: http://www.gamaliel.org (also accessed 10-15-14).
[ii] Laura Barrett, “A Generational Divide Between Organizers in Ferguson,” Rooflines (Shelterforce blog), 10-15-14.
[iv] Gamaliel petition, “After Ferguson, We Must Change Police and Court Practices in St. Louis County, To: County Executive Candidates Rick Stream and Steve Stenger:”
action.groundswell-mvmt.org/petitions/change-police-and-court-practices-in-st-louis-county
[v] Laura Barrett, “A Generational Divide Between Organizers in Ferguson,” Rooflines (Shelterforce blog), 10-15-14.
[vi] To give an example, the Catholic Campaign for Human Development has given MCU the following national grants: $25,000 (2007-2008); $30,000 (2008-2009); $30,000 (2009-2010); $40,000 (2010-2011); $45,000 (2011-2012); $55,000 (2012-2013).

The 13 anti-Catholic “power tactics” of Saul Alinsky, (Barack Obama) and community organizations

alinskysmallIn his book Rules for Radicals, Saul Alinsky states “Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them.  In the world of give and take, tactics is the art of how to take and how to give.  Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.” p.126

Saul Alinsky’s 13 “power tactics” are inconsistent with Catholic teaching and prove to be anti-Catholic as you will see below.  Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and current community organizers have followed and do follow the “power tactics.”  These tactics are found on pages 127-134 of Rules for Radicals:

1.  “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2.  “Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat.  It also means a collapse of communication, as we have noted.”

3.  “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.  Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

4.  “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

5.  Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule.  Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.”

6.  “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.  If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with tactic.”

7.  “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment, like going to church on Sunday.

8.  “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9.  “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10.  “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.”

11.  “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside;  this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative.”

12.  “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.  You cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying “You’re right – we don’t know what to do about this issue.  Now you tell us.””

13.  Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities.  One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and “frozen.”…  Obviously there is no point to tactics unless one has a target upon which to center the attacks…  Furthermore, any target can always say, “Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?”  When you “freeze the target,” you disregard these arguments…  Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the ‘others’ come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.”

If a community organization on this list (click here) is in your Catholic diocese and has any of its parishes as members, then they use the anti-Catholic “power tactics” listed above.  Take these steps (click here) to remove them.

Change Agents V1To learn more about the history and damaging influence of Saul Alinsky on prominent Catholic clergy and laity click on → Change Agents: Alinskyian Organizing Among Religious Bodies, which is available at Amazon.  By Stephanie Block.

O Holy Spirit, strengthen us to defend all that is holy.

Peter L. Hodges Sr.

How Alinskyianism entered Catholic parishes (and intersects with “Common Core” standards)

By Stephanie Block

alinskysmall

Recently, while preparing an article on Common Core national standards, someone suggested that I might be interested in the “open letters” written by a group called Catholics for Truth in Education operating in Illinois from 1974 into the 90s.  Interestingly enough, a set of these “open letters” just happened to have been sitting on my bookshelf for over a decade, waiting to be examined.
There may have been other Catholics for Truth in Education publications, as well, but the materials in my possession begin around the time of the first Alinskyian Call to Action conference[i] in 1976, an event that galvanized dissent within the Catholic Church of the United States and attempted to manipulate the bishops into supporting it.  The ecclesial and social landscape which the “open letters” describe was chaotic, experimental, and hostile to traditional worship.
The first “open letter” examines a 1977 planning document titled the “Position Paper on Networks of Regional Parishes for Corporate Reconstruction” written by the (since deceased) industrial/organizational psychologist Dr. Robert R. Newsome.[ii]
Newsome was on the cutting edge of “parish renewal.”  To pioneer various renewal strategies and incubate a reformed Church, he conceived of an “alliance” of Chicago parishes, the Parish Corporate Renewal Network, which would operate unmolested until other structures replaced it.    A 1977 request grant request for the network wrote that “the project faces a challenge of dramatically changing the way Catholic parishes serve themselves and the secular community of which they are a part.  Heretofore, parishes have principally focused upon the salvation and grace of their members.  The purpose of this project is to unleash the capacity of parishes to be apostolic organizations with a new vision, mission, and capability for developing the greatness and well-being of mankind.” [iii]
For a Catholic to separate “the greatness and well-being of mankind” from “salvation and grace” is quite extraordinary but Newsome proposed to accomplish it in three phases.  The first targeted parish staff and created five teams of laity for re-education and training.
Once properly prepared, they would function like a virus inside the parish community, moving with “a clear, shared vision and mission” but anticipating “rejection.” (page 5) Small faith communities with the unappealing title of “Corporate Reflection Centers” were to be formed throughout each parish during this next (second) phase and each would model the new vision: “This vision of corporate man is one in which unity in diversity rather than uniformity is values.”
By phase three, the parish was ready to move out into the community at large, seeking “partnership” “with all men of good will for the sake of the transformation of the urban community and the world.” (page 6)  Unsophisticated by today’s standards, where we no longer alert people that they are to be transformed but simply launch into the process, Newsome’s project was remarkable forthright.
jack egan
Then, there was Msgr. John (Jack) Egan – who not only served on Saul Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation board but co-chaired the 1976 Call to Action conference’s plenary sessions –and who also served on the Board of Advisers for the Parish Corporate Renewal Network.  Incarnate in Father Egan, the elements of organized Church dissent, organized secular political activism, and a reorganized parish were intrinsically related to one another.  Easy enough to see in hindsight.
Msgr. Egan writes:
     Working with parishes through my diocesan post in Chicago’s Office of Urban Affairs, I saw the parish as a neighborhood institution with great potential for influence.  Neighborhood issues of housing, police protection, education, availability of health services and sanitation affected the daily life of parishioners.  The parish priests and people could not afford not to be involved.  Citizen-parishioners along with their clergy became key actors in community organizations which not only improved the quality of life in their own neighborhoods, but had a great effect on the life of the city of Chicago.
     Today there are more cities in the nation boasting of strong citizen groups than ever before.  Generally speaking, the growth of community organization in our urban areas has been supported both financially and morally in large measure by parishes which recognize the critical relationship between critical human problems and the dignity of persons in their neighborhoods.  I would venture to say that without Church support most of the community organizations would either have been neither developed nor sustained.[iv]
By the second “open letter,” five months later, the US bishops had responded to the 1976 Call to Action recommendations, many of which were too radical for implementation.  However, a “Project for Parish Renewal” was approved as a “major priority” for every US diocese[v] and Catholics for Truth in Education watched the process, as it unfolded in Chicago, closely.
From the advantage of 35 years in the future, one can see that, for some, “renewal” was an honest endeavor.  To them, it meant simply a reinvigoration of parish life that might include building new schools, improving resources, or developing ministries.  For the reformers, however, “renewal” was consciously and deliberately ordered toward ideological “transformation.”  A transformed parish would have little resemblance to a Catholic community.  The third “open letter” documents the push of various Network clergy for women and married priests, acceptance of divorce, homosexuality, and birth control, as well as belief in a non-hierarchical Church structure that was to be separated from Rome.  The Network “theological adviser,” a philosophy professor[vi]  hired to conduct talks in Chicago-area parishes about Network’s vision for restructuring, is quoted spouting pure liberation theology. “Someday this world will be The Kingdom,” he assures listeners.  “The Kingdom is the state of affairs – the here and now.”
saul-alinsky-poster
Maybe somebody’s Kingdom, but not Christ’s.[vii]
One gets lost in among the interconnected names and groups who are pushing this transformative, un-Catholic form of “renewal.” Equally numbing are the grey, bureaucratic details that comprise this or that version of the new structure.  The interesting bit, however, is where the action leads.  Once parishes are restructured and “properly” retrained, what are they primed to do?
Catholics for Truth in Education concludes by letter #4 that, for one thing, they are to be drawn into Alinskyian community organizations and their activism.  Letter # 9, five years later, describes an archdiocesan program structured exactly along those lines, including parish listening sessions to make people “feel important” (yes, that’s what the archdiocesan materials say), analysis of these sessions for purposes of developing strategic plans, provision of “theological reflection and leadership training,” all aimed at ecumenical political activism.  “A major part of this renewal is getting the Catholic laity involved in performing the social ministry of the Church,” Dr. Newsome opines, “including the building of better neighborhoods and communities.”[viii]  Community organizing is a means to this end.
But there are others.  Letter #5 takes the reader on a romping survey of the most exciting liberationist activity at the time – which is where, oddly enough, it intersects with contemporary Common Core national standards (and why, I suspect, I was encouraged to read the “open letters”).  In the middle of discussion about theological movements in Latin America and their challenges to Church teaching, the reader is introduced to a process for controlling groups of people called “Management by Objectives.”  (MBO)
MBO had initially been introduced into the business world as an accounting system.  Like education reform pedagogy called “mastery learning” – later called “outcome based education” and still later reintroduced through the Common Core national standards – or psychology’s value clarification techniques, MBO was a systematic attempt to reprogram the individual’s values and actions.  Simply stated, the process begins with predetermined goals (or standards) to which the individual is held accountable.  Of concern to Catholics for Truth in Education, several dioceses around the country were using MBO strategies as part of their pastoral planning for renewal.
Almost prescient for a time that predated a global Internet and cell phones, Catholics for Truth in Education worried about computerized data collection schemes that supported MBO aims.  What must have seemed paranoid to most readers then has an air of prophesy to a generation that lives with the reality of government monitoring of citizens.  The people who recoiled from Huxley’s Brave New World couldn’t have fathomed the level of invasiveness that would become possible and tolerated.
The “letters” written throughout the 1980s[ix] drown the reader with descriptions of specific programs, practitioners, and tactics.  So many Catholics were dancing behind the Pied Piper of “change” with little curiosity about where he was leading.   Catholics for Truth in Education examined dozens of re-education programs in the Chicago Archdiocese – among them the once ubiquitous RENEW[x] – and explained the relationship of each to Call to Action dissent and a socialistic world view.
The end product, however, was never about the Church, not really, but about society.  The Church had to be transformed so that it wouldn’t be an obstacle to transforming society.  Catholics for Truth in Education harangues about Marxist infiltration and apostasy are easy to dismiss as alarmist but, after decades of chaos, the Church in the U.S. faces serious persecution for holding on to the last shreds of Catholic integrity.  The old, bureaucratic liberals, who still push their un-Catholic agendas – JustFaith and Nuns on the Bus, Alinskyian organizers and New Agers, I’m looking at you – are comfortable with that.
Historical facts are hard to dispute – and they have led to the results that are very much what Catholics for Truth in Education feared: too many Catholics who reject Church teaching.  After her death, the son of Catholics for Truth in Education’s founding president, Mary Catherine Davis, wrote, “The more that time passes the more things big and small I see my mother was right about.”
Yes, she was.
Change Agents V1Spero columnist Stephanie Block edits the New Mexico-based Los Pequenos newspaper and is the author of the four volume Change Agents: Alinskyian Organizing Among Religious Bodies, which is available at Amazon.
[i] For a detailed history of the relationship between Alinsky-trained clerics and the Call to Action dissenting movement in the US Catholic Church, see “Underground Call to Action:” http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=1318&CFID=66214206&CFTOKEN=51725830
[ii] Robert R. Newsome also wrote a book, The ministering parish: methods and procedures for pastoral organization, Paulist Press, 1982.
[iii] “Request for Foundation Assistance from Parish Corporate Renewal Network (Internal Corporate Renewal Network),” August 1, 1977, page 1.  Six foundations were approached using this document: DeRance, Inc., George Halas Foundation, Lewis Foundation, Lilly Endowment, Inc., Raskob Foundation, and the Dr. Scholl Foundation.  The last of these foundations publically distanced itself from the whole business, according to “open letter #4.”
[iv] Msgr. John J. Egan, “Do we need parishes?” Parish Ministry, Nov-Dec 1980, pp 2-3, as quoted in Catholics for Truth in Education “open letter” #9, part 2 (June 1983).
[v] “A Call to Action: Five-Year plan of Action” Origins 8, 5-28-78.
[vi] The November 1984 “open letter” quotes this Network theological adviser telling his students, “ We affirmed the Church is dead and found it a liberating revelation,” and “Isn’t being a Catholic one of the biggest blocks to being a Christian?” 
[vii] See John 18:36…and Romans 14: 17. 
[viii] Jack Houston, “’Parish renewal’ project sparks a Catholic battle,” Chicago Tribune, 5-31-79.
[ix] “Open letters” #6-9 sport the by-line of Peter S. Newman, editor.  The other issues carry no attribution.
[x] See also Mary Jo Anderson, “Buried in the Fine Print: An Inside Look at RENEW 2000,” Crisis, March 1999; Frank Morriss’ “Restructuring the Church into Their Own Image: The Link Between RENEW and the New Biblical Scholarship,” Wanderer Forum Foundation Quarterly, June 1992;  Beth Drennan, Esq., “Background Check of RENEW 2000 Contributors Reveals RENEW 2000 Texts Laced with Call to Action Names,” Women Faith and Family, 1998.  Drennan has also published another discussion of the Call to Action elements found in RENEW 2000 in “Paulists’ RENEW 2000 Is Just a Front for Call to Action,” The Wanderer, 9-10-98.
the-love-song-of-saul-alinski2

ALERT: Immigration bill gives power to ACORN-style community organizations

Lay Catholic LogoThe Immigration reform bill, S. 744 must not be allowed to pass the U.S. Senate.  If it does pass, then the House of Representatives version must be stopped and a new immigration reform bill must be drafted that is truly just.  The current bill contains grave failings that will corrupt American society because it gives power to ACORN-style community organizations in perpetuity.


The first example of these grave failings is in section 2106 (b) (page 131) of S. 744 (click here and then on “Weekly Top Five” to find bill S. 744). It allows for ACORN-style community organizations to “assist eligible applicants.”  See an excerpt of the text below:

“Eligible Public or Private Non-profit Organization- The term `eligible public or private nonprofit’ means a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization, including a community, faith-based or other immigrant-serving organization…”

A second example is found in section 2531 and 2535 (a)(3) (page 383) of S. 744 (click here and then on “Weekly Top Five” to find bill S. 744):  Section 2531 creates a non-profit named the “United States Citizenship Foundation” and calls for a council of directors.  Section 2535 (a)(3) calls for 10 directors of the “United States Citizenship Foundation” to come from national community-based organizations.  See the excerpt below:

10 directors, appointed by the ex-officio directors designated in paragraphs (1) and (2), from national community-based organizations…”

Community organizations that would be eligible to participate in this would-be law are ACORN-style or more notably, Alinsky-style community organizations.  There are at least 7 of these national organizations in the U.S. and each one has a vast network of affiliates.  Make no mistake, they have no real competition for this bill’s requirements.  Their politics are socialistic, they identify with the Democratic Party and they always deceptively cloak their ideas in Catholic terminology like;  social justice, common good, etc.  These organizations come from the Alinsky model that intentionally manipulated the Catholic Church and admitted doing so.

Which community organization would be the most likely to benefit from this bill?  Quite possibly, PICO National Network.  PICO has a program called “Campaign for Citizenship.”  Incidentally, or not so, they are responsible for the protest at Kansas secretary of state, Kris Kobach’s home this past Saturday, June 15th.

O Holy Spirit, strengthen us to defend all that is holy.

Peter L. Hodges Sr.

Change Agents V1The best source of information on Alinsky/ACORN-style community organizations is the new book by Stephanie Block titled Change Agents:  Alinskyian Organizing Among Religious Bodies.  CLICK HERE to BUY Change Agents at Amazon.com for only $9.00

Organizing for Action: Barack Obama’s New Community Organization

Lay Catholic Logo

President Obama as Barack the Organizer exposes the purely partisan nature of Alinskyian political organizing.  It’s the Chicago Way.

By Stephanie Block

OFA logo 2One of the most frustrating experiences a congregant can face is watching his faith community join an Alinskyian community organization (also referred to as a socialist community organization by “Lay Catholics”.) Sooner or later, he will approach the pastor, complaining that the organization is “just another political” group. The pastor patronizingly retorts that it isn’t.

OFA logoPresident Barack Obama, however, is providing the chastened congregant with new ammunition. The Obama campaign for reelection has morphed into a non-profit entity called Organizing for Action.[i] Jon Carson, who directed Obama’s Office of Public Engagement during the president’s first term and is now executive director of Organizing for Action, has made a YouTube presentation[ii]…  See below:

…(as has the president’s wife, Michelle[iii]) for the initiative. Carson invites folks – yes, it’s very folksy – to join the group and form a lobbying machine for Obama’s agenda, which is currently working on passage of comprehensive immigration reform legislation, gun control legislation, and a progressive budget. It links to BarackObama.com, so there’s no question who’s the lead organizer.

Are the Alinskyian community organizing networks involved in Organizing for Action? As it would have been awkward for non-profits to have been directly involved with the Obama reelection campaign, it is not surprising that Organizing for Action, rising from that campaign, is not immediately associated with them. However, there are hints that a marriage has been proposed and is forthcoming.

For instance, Ana Garcia-Ashley, Gamaliels executive director, writes:

“As we came upon Election Day, these relationships [that Gamaliel has forged with ‘electoral organizing allies’] may have saved our democracy. … We now have in place a powerful alliance of relationships that allowed us to navigate undeterred through these threats to our democracy. Now we can take next steps together. We seek to create a just world, built around our faith values. We will work together to repeal the laws that limit our democratic rights, and go even further, working to change the system that created the Great Recession and several concurrent wars. As leaders of the new progressive movement in America, we envision an economy that works for all, and with the fire of our faith we will work together to make that dream a reality.”[iv]

There has also been reportage about the convening of various religious left coalitions recently, specifically around the three issues that Organizing for Action has chosen for its opening salvos.

Gun Control:

Sojourners chief Jim Wallis blamed the National Rifle Association as a primary reason for violence in America, citing phenomenally high gun-murder rates in Chicago (but never mentioning Chicago’s strict gun control).[v] Along with the PICO National Network, it used the occasion of the Newtown shootings to lobby 100 senators with a letter, primarily signed by clergy, urging support for gun-control legislation.[vi]

Metro Industrial Areas Foundation, a New York City affiliate of (the Industrial Areas Foundation, founded by Saul Alinsky) the premier Alinskyian organizing network, joined with their Chicago affiliate, United Power for Action and Justice, in a campaign “to shut down the most irresponsible gun dealers in its metropolitan area.”[vii]

Comprehensive Immigration Reform:

The Interfaith Immigration Coalition, which is promoted by Faith in Public Life, includes Sojourners, many of the prominent, dissident Catholic groups (NETWORK, Pax Christi, Leadership Conference of Women Religious, etc.), national denominational entities with strong Alinskyian organizing ties, the PICO National Network and Interfaith Worker Justice.

Of course, this is nothing new.

Throughout the years, Interfaith Worker Justice has coordinated vigils, rallies, and “pulpit swaps” for comprehensive immigration reform. The Southwest Industrial Areas Foundation has coordinated “clergy preaching for the pulpit” on the topic. Gamaliel has run National Prayer Vigil Campaigns and a Civil Rights of Immigrants Campaign. The White House has held gatherings of “faith leaders,” hoping to craft coordinated messages of “religious” support for its efforts. These groups have been working together for a long time.

Obama’s Budget (not Paul Ryan’s):

Congressman Paul Ryan’s (R-Wisc.) proposal for a federal budget based on his understanding of Catholic social principles such as “subsidiarity” and fiscal discipline became a focal point against which the Alinskyian organizing networks and their allies enthusiastically rallied.

The PICO National Network, Interfaith Worker Justice, and others (including NETWORK, Catholics United, Sojourners, and Faith in Public Life) staged “Loaves and Fishes” actions “to highlight the need for moral and political courage in federal budget negotiations.”[viii] NETWORK specifically attacked Ryan’s proposed budget cuts, orchestrating a well-publicized “Nuns on the Bus” tour through nine states.[ix]

In Summary

Clearly, there isn’t a one-to-one correlation here but an observation that fellow travelers, well, travel together. They share the road and the destination, which is important to understand when the Alinskyian organizations protest that they’re “not political.” No, they’re “not political…” just like Obama’s Organizing for Action is “not political.”

Change Agents V1Stephanie Block is a Spero News columnist and author and also edits the New Mexico-based Los Pequenos newspaper. She recently published her four-volume work on Alinskyian political organizing, ‘Change Agents’, available at Amazon.  CLICK HERE to get ‘Change Agents.’

Keep another Obama from

[i] Ken Thomas, “New nonprofit to promote Obama agenda,” The Guardian, 1-18-13. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10618562 : “In an unprecedented move, President Barack Obama’s vaunted political organization is being turned into a nonprofit group — funded in part by corporate money — to mobilize support behind the president’s second-term agenda.”
[ii] Jon Carson, “Executive Director of Organizing for Action, Outlines Next Steps:”
[iii] “The First Lady on the Launch of Organizing for Action:” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYT68Uii1dk
[iv] Ana Garcia-Ashley, “Show Me What Democracy Looks Like,: Huffington Post, 11-7-12.
[v] Mark Tooley, “Religious Left Wants Control of More than Guns,” Front Page Magazine, 1-18-13.
[vi] Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), “Newtown rabbi joins Muslim, Christian clergy in urging gun controls,” 3-12-13. Letter and signatories: http://www.piconetwork.org/tools-resources/document/letter-from-Newtown-with-signers-2013-03-10.pdf
[vii] Alec Harris and The Rev. David Brawley, “Gun control without waiting for Congress Wield the buying power of police departments and the military,” New York Daily News, 2-7-13.
[viii] Faith in Public Life Press Release, “Faith Community to Congress: ‘It Doesn’t Take a Miracle to Make a Moral Budget’,” 3-18-13.
[ix] Allison Kilkenny, “The Resistance Continues as Citizens Fight Budget Cuts,” The Nation, 6-26-12.

Organizing for Action: the Democratic Party’s New Machine (Alinsky/Socialist Community Organization)

President Obama as Barack the Organizer exposes the purely partisan nature of Alinskyian political organizing.  It’s the Chicago Way.

By Stephanie Block

OFA logo 2One of the most frustrating experiences a congregant can face is watching his faith community join an Alinskyian community organization (also referred to as a socialist community organization by “Lay Catholics”.) Sooner or later, he will approach the pastor, complaining that the organization is “just another political” group. The pastor patronizingly retorts that it isn’t.

OFA logoPresident Barack Obama, however, is providing the chastened congregant with new ammunition. The Obama campaign for reelection has morphed into a non-profit entity called Organizing for Action.[i] Jon Carson, who directed Obama’s Office of Public Engagement during the president’s first term and is now executive director of Organizing for Action, has made a YouTube presentation[ii]…  See below:

…(as has the president’s wife, Michelle[iii]) for the initiative. Carson invites folks – yes, it’s very folksy – to join the group and form a lobbying machine for Obama’s agenda, which is currently working on passage of comprehensive immigration reform legislation, gun control legislation, and a progressive budget. It links to BarackObama.com, so there’s no question who’s the lead organizer.

Are the Alinskyian community organizing networks involved in Organizing for Action? As it would have been awkward for non-profits to have been directly involved with the Obama reelection campaign, it is not surprising that Organizing for Action, rising from that campaign, is not immediately associated with them. However, there are hints that a marriage has been proposed and is forthcoming.

For instance, Ana Garcia-Ashley, Gamaliels executive director, writes:

“As we came upon Election Day, these relationships [that Gamaliel has forged with ‘electoral organizing allies’] may have saved our democracy. … We now have in place a powerful alliance of relationships that allowed us to navigate undeterred through these threats to our democracy. Now we can take next steps together. We seek to create a just world, built around our faith values. We will work together to repeal the laws that limit our democratic rights, and go even further, working to change the system that created the Great Recession and several concurrent wars. As leaders of the new progressive movement in America, we envision an economy that works for all, and with the fire of our faith we will work together to make that dream a reality.”[iv]

There has also been reportage about the convening of various religious left coalitions recently, specifically around the three issues that Organizing for Action has chosen for its opening salvos.

Gun Control:

Sojourners chief Jim Wallis blamed the National Rifle Association as a primary reason for violence in America, citing phenomenally high gun-murder rates in Chicago (but never mentioning Chicago’s strict gun control).[v] Along with the PICO National Network, it used the occasion of the Newtown shootings to lobby 100 senators with a letter, primarily signed by clergy, urging support for gun-control legislation.[vi]

Metro Industrial Areas Foundation, a New York City affiliate of (the Industrial Areas Foundation, founded by Saul Alinsky) the premier Alinskyian organizing network, joined with their Chicago affiliate, United Power for Action and Justice, in a campaign “to shut down the most irresponsible gun dealers in its metropolitan area.”[vii]

Comprehensive Immigration Reform:

The Interfaith Immigration Coalition, which is promoted by Faith in Public Life, includes Sojourners, many of the prominent, dissident Catholic groups (NETWORK, Pax Christi, Leadership Conference of Women Religious, etc.), national denominational entities with strong Alinskyian organizing ties, the PICO National Network and Interfaith Worker Justice.

Of course, this is nothing new.

Throughout the years, Interfaith Worker Justice has coordinated vigils, rallies, and “pulpit swaps” for comprehensive immigration reform. The Southwest Industrial Areas Foundation has coordinated “clergy preaching for the pulpit” on the topic. Gamaliel has run National Prayer Vigil Campaigns and a Civil Rights of Immigrants Campaign. The White House has held gatherings of “faith leaders,” hoping to craft coordinated messages of “religious” support for its efforts. These groups have been working together for a long time.

Obama’s Budget (not Paul Ryan’s):

Congressman Paul Ryan’s (R-Wisc.) proposal for a federal budget based on his understanding of Catholic social principles such as “subsidiarity” and fiscal discipline became a focal point against which the Alinskyian organizing networks and their allies enthusiastically rallied.

The PICO National Network, Interfaith Worker Justice, and others (including NETWORK, Catholics United, Sojourners, and Faith in Public Life) staged “Loaves and Fishes” actions “to highlight the need for moral and political courage in federal budget negotiations.”[viii] NETWORK specifically attacked Ryan’s proposed budget cuts, orchestrating a well-publicized “Nuns on the Bus” tour through nine states.[ix]

In Summary

Clearly, there isn’t a one-to-one correlation here but an observation that fellow travelers, well, travel together. They share the road and the destination, which is important to understand when the Alinskyian organizations protest that they’re “not political.” No, they’re “not political…” just like Obama’s Organizing for Action is “not political.”

Change Agents V1Stephanie Block is a Spero News columnist and author and also edits the New Mexico-based Los Pequenos newspaper. She recently published her four-volume work on Alinskyian political organizing, ‘Change Agents’, available at Amazon.  CLICK HERE to get ‘Change Agents.’

[i] Ken Thomas, “New nonprofit to promote Obama agenda,” The Guardian, 1-18-13. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10618562 : “In an unprecedented move, President Barack Obama’s vaunted political organization is being turned into a nonprofit group — funded in part by corporate money — to mobilize support behind the president’s second-term agenda.”
[ii] Jon Carson, “Executive Director of Organizing for Action, Outlines Next Steps:”
[iii] “The First Lady on the Launch of Organizing for Action:” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYT68Uii1dk
[iv] Ana Garcia-Ashley, “Show Me What Democracy Looks Like,: Huffington Post, 11-7-12.
[v] Mark Tooley, “Religious Left Wants Control of More than Guns,” Front Page Magazine, 1-18-13.
[vi] Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), “Newtown rabbi joins Muslim, Christian clergy in urging gun controls,” 3-12-13. Letter and signatories: http://www.piconetwork.org/tools-resources/document/letter-from-Newtown-with-signers-2013-03-10.pdf
[vii] Alec Harris and The Rev. David Brawley, “Gun control without waiting for Congress Wield the buying power of police departments and the military,” New York Daily News, 2-7-13.
[viii] Faith in Public Life Press Release, “Faith Community to Congress: ‘It Doesn’t Take a Miracle to Make a Moral Budget’,” 3-18-13.
[ix] Allison Kilkenny, “The Resistance Continues as Citizens Fight Budget Cuts,” The Nation, 6-26-12.

List of 87 Catholic Grants Given to Alinsky-Inspired Community Organizations in 2011-2012

In 2011-2012 at least 87 Catholic Campaign for Human Develpoment (CCHD) grants were given to Saul Alinsky-Inspired (socialist) community organizations. The Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) collection is this weekend November 17 and 18th.  Instead of giving to the CCHD in the second collection, give extra in the first collection to your own parish or give to a charity you can be sure will help the poor and vulnerable.  75% of the CCHD collection does go to the national CCHD office.  So, your money is going to these organizations.

Alinsky founded the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF.)  Here are five major national Alinsky-Inspired community organizations whose affiliates received CCHD grants in 2011-2012:

1.  Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF)  www.industrialareasfoundation.org
2.  Gamaliel  www.gamaliel.org
3.  People Improving Communities through Organizing (PICO)  www.piconetwork.org
4.  Direct Action & Research Training (DART)  www.thedartcenter.org
5.  Interfaith Worker Justice (IWJ)  www.iwj.org

Alinsky intended to use the Catholic Church to gain power for atheistic and marxist ideas.  Alinsky wrote Rules for Radicals, where he dedicated the book to Lucifer and on pg. 94 he ridicules the Catholic Church and describes how he deceived the Church.

The following is the numerical breakdown of the CCHD grants given to Alinsky-Inspired organizations in 2011-2012:

  • 23 grants given to affiliates of the Industrial Areas Foundation
  • 23 grants given to affiliates of Gamaliel
  • 23 grants given to affiliates of People Improving Communities through Organizing
  • 10 grants given to affiliates of Interfaith Worker Justice
  • 8 grants given to affiliates of Direct Action & Research Training
  • 87 total

Below is the list of CCHD grantees by Archdiocese or Diocese for 2011-2012.  The left column are affiliates of Alinsky-Inspired organizations who received the grants and the right column are their national Alinsky organizations.  The affiliates received grants ranging from $25,000 to $70,000:

CCHD 2012 Grantees by Arch/Diocese Alinsky-Inspired Organization Affiliation
Food and Medicine
Portland, ME
IWJ
Greater Boston Interfaith Organization
Boston, MA
IAF
Brockton Interfaith Community
Boston, MA
PICO
United Interfaith Action of Southeast Massachusetts
Fall River, MA
PICO
Able NH
Manchester, NH
Gamaliel
Camden Churches Organized for People
Camden, NJ
PICO
New Labor Education & Training Institute, Inc.
Newark, NJ
IWJ
Brooklyn Congregations United
Brooklyn, NY
PICO
Queens Congregations United for Action
Brooklyn, NY
PICO
Niagara Organizing Alliance for Hope
Buffalo, NY
Gamaliel
VOICE – Buffalo, Inc.
Buffalo, NY
Gamaliel
Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition, Inc.
New York, NY
Gamaliel
Tompkins County Workers Center
Rochester, NY
IWJ
Moving in Congregations, Acting in Hope MICAH
Syracuse, NY
PICO
Alliance of Communities Transforming Syracuse
Syracuse, NY
Gamaliel
Philadelphians Organized to Witness, Empower and Rebuild
Philadelphia, PA
PICO
Pittsburg Interfaith Impact Network
Pittsburgh, PA
Gamaliel
Lake County Center for Independent Living
Chicago, IL
IAF
Developing Communities Project, Inc.
Chicago, IL (Barack Obama was their executive director)
Gamaliel (formerly)
Lake County Sponsors
Chicago, IL
IAF
DuPage Sponsors
Joliet, IL
IAF
United Congregations of Metro-East
Springfield, IL
Gamaliel
Faith Coalition for the Common Good
Springfield, IL
Gamaliel
Calumet Project For Industrial Jobs
Gary, IN
IWJ
Indianapolis Congregation Action Network
Indianapolis, IN
PICO
People Acting Together in Howard
Baltimore, MD
IAF
Metropolitan Organizing Strategy Enabling Strength
Detroit, MI
Gamaliel
Michigan Organizing Project
Kalamazoo, MI
IWJ
Joint-religious Organizing Network for Action and Hope
Kalamazoo, MI
Gamaliel
The Ezekial Project of Saginaw
Saginaw, MI
Gamaliel
Metropolitan Congregations United
Saint Louis, MO
Gamaliel
Cincinnati Interfaith Workers Center
Cincinnati, OH
IWJ
Building Responsibility Equality and Dignity
Columbus, OH
DART
Alliance for Congregational Transformation Influencing Our Neighborhoods (ACTION)
Youngstown, OH
Gamaliel
Justice Organization Sharing Hope & United for Action
Green Bay, WI
Gamaliel
ESTHER
Green Bay, WI
Gamaliel
JONAH, Inc.
LaCrosse, WI
Gamaliel
AMOS, Inc.
LaCrosse, WI
Gamaliel
Milwaukee Innercity Congregations Allied for Hope
Milwaukee, WI
Gamaliel
Common Ground Inc.
Milwaukee, WI
IAF
Racine Interfaith Coalition
Milwaukee, WI
Gamaliel
Broward Organized Leaders Doing Justice
Miami, FL
DART
People Acting for Community Together, Inc.
Miami, FL
DART
Fighting Against Injustice Towards Harmony (FAITH)
Orlando, FL
DART
Polk Ecumenical Action Council for Empowerment
Orlando, FL
DART
Federation of Congregations United to Serve
Orlando, FL
PICO
People Engaged in Active Community Efforts
Palm Beach, FL
DART
Interfaith Coalition for Action Reconciliation and Empowerment
Saint Augustine, FL
DART
Atlantans Building Leadership for Empowerment
Atlanta, GA
Gamaliel
Citizens of Louisville Organized & United Together
Louisville, KY
DART
Together Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, LA
PICO
The Jeremiah Group
New Orleans, LA
IAF
The MICAH Project
New Orleans, LA
PICO
Northern and Central Louisiana Interfaith
Shreveport, LA
IAF
Jackson Metro Sponsoring Committee
Jackson, MS
IAF
Triangle CAN (Congregations Associations and Neighborhoods)
Raleigh, NC
IAF
Workers Interfaith Network
Memphis, TN
IWJ
Northwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center
Little Rock, AR
IWJ
Quad Cities Interfaith
Davenport, IA
Gamaliel
AMOS Institute of Public Life
Des Moines, IA
IAF
Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en Lucha
Saint Paul and Minneapolis, MN
IWJ
Albuquerque Interfaith, Inc.
Santa Fe, NM
IAF
Oklahoma Sponsoring Committee (renamed VOICE OKC)
Oklahoma City, OK
IAF
Austin Interfaith Sponsoring Committee
Austin, TX
IAF
Valley Interfaith Leadership and Educational Council
Brownsville, TX
IAF
Dallas Area Interfaith Sponsoring Committee
Dallas, TX
IAF
El Paso Interreligious Sponsoring Organization
El Paso, TX
IAF
ACT Human Development Fund
Fort Worth, TX
IAF
Merced Organizing Project
Fresno, CA
PICO
Faith in Action Kern County, Inc.
Fresno, CA
PICO
Faith in Community
Fresno, CA
PICO
Ventura County Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice
Los Angeles, CA
IWJ
Communities Organized for Relational Power in Action
Monterey, CA
IAF
GENESIS
Oakland, CA
Gamaliel
Oakland Community Organizations
Oakland, CA
PICO
Congregations Organizing for Renewal
Oakland, CA
PICO
Orange County Congregation Community Organization
Orange, CA
PICO
Sacramento Area Congregations Together
Sacramento, CA
PICO
Placer People of Faith Together
Sacramento, CA
PICO
Sacramento Valley Organizing Community
Sacramento, CA
IAF
Inland Congregations United for Change
San Bernardino, CA
PICO
PACT: People Acting in Community Together
San Jose, CA
PICO
North Bay Organizing Project
Santa Rosa, CA
IAF
North Bay Sponsoring Committee
Santa Rosa, CA
IAF
Congregations Building Community
Stockton, CA
PICO
People and Congregations for Stockton, Inc.
Stockton, CA
PICO
Las Vegas Valley Interfaith Sponsoring Committee
Las Vegas, NV
IAF

“Catholics For Obama” Bears False Witness on Human Dignity and the Common Good

President Obama’s “Catholics For Obama” has a comparison called The Choice For Catholics In This Election.  They talk about promoting “Human Dignity” and the “Common Good” through the President’s positions on five issues.  I will explain how Barack Obama uses these Catholic social teaching terms falsely.  Here is “Catholics For Obama’s” introductory paragraph (with my critiques in red):

Human dignity and the common good are values that define the Catholic faith, and they’re at the core of President Obama’s commitment to a thriving middle class and a fair, strong economy. Catholics support President Obama because (He uses Catholic Social Teaching (CST) terminology like “human dignity” and the “common good” to get the trust of Catholics.  Catholics loyal to President Obama use terminology associated with CST in order to manipulate the issues of abortion, war, same-sex marriage, immigration reform, etc. These CST terms are; “Human dignity”, “common good”, “social justice” and “just war.” They will also manipulate the following terms common to Catholics; justice, pro-life, preferential option for the poor, care for the environment, etc. Their use of these terms confuses many Catholics, causing them to vote contrary to their conscience.  See Left at the Altar: How the Democrats Lost the Catholics and How the Catholics Can Save the Democrats by Michael Sean Winters.) he understands the importance of an active faith in pursuit of the common good. This has been the story of his life, guiding him from his work with Catholic churches (where he worked for a Saul Alinsky-Inspired community organization to inject contradictory propositions into the Church and helped to plant the seed for the anti-Catholic ObamaCare and it’s HHS mandate) on the South Side of Chicago through his career as a public servant. President Obama’s record, character and values make the choice in this election stark and clear. Join Catholics for Obama and learn more about the President’s positions on the issues at http://www.barackobama.com/catholics.

Here are the positions on five issues “Catholics For Obama” says that the President pursues “human dignity” and the “common good” (with my critiques in red on how he violates human dignity and the common good):

  1. Economic Recovery and the Dignity of Work
    1. President Obama believes we need to keep moving
      America forward and has a real, achievable plan to
      create an economy built to last with a strong middle
      class at its core.  (Under President Obama 23 million Americans are unemployed, underemployed or have given up looking for employment.  Catholicism teaches “Unemployment almost always wounds its victim’s dignity and threatens the equilibrium of his life. Besides the harm done to him personally, it entails many risks for his family.”- Catechism of the Catholic Church, Section 2436 written in context of the Seventh Commandment, “You shall not steal”)
  2. Tax Fairness
    1. President Obama believes our tax system should reflect
      our values, reward hard work and responsibility, and ask everyone to do their fair share. President Obama supports tax reform that reflects the common sense idea that millionaires and billionaires shouldn’t pay a lower tax rate than many middle-class families.  (President Obama has made the false claim and implies here that the wealthy pay a lower income tax rate than the middle-class.  He is actually comparing the capital gains rate of a wealthy person to the income tax rate of a middle-class person.  This is a terrible deception and an example of class warfare.  Pope Leo XIII said, “The great mistake made in regard to the matter now under consideration is to take up with the notion that class is naturally hostile to class, and that the wealthy and the working men are intended by nature to live in mutual conflict. So irrational and so false is this view that the direct contrary is the truth.)
  3. Access To Affordable Healthcare
    1. President Obama passed historic health reforms so
      no American will ever go broke just because they get
      sick. Obamacare is also preventing millions of Americans with preexisting conditions from being denied coverage—increasing the security of all families.  (ObamaCare is socialism, which the Catholic Church condemns.  The Church advocates for universal healthcare but, not through government centralized planning.  ObamaCare also gave us the religious freedom crushing HHS mandate that forces Catholic and other institutions to pay for abortions, sterilizations and contraception.)
  4. Auto Rescue
    1. President Obama made the tough call to rescue
      the auto industry when it was on the brink. He saved
      local businesses and more than a million jobs up and
      down the supply chain, sparing countless families
      and communities from financial ruin.  (He closed local businesses known as auto dealerships.  Over 2,200 dealerships were closed by Obama’s “Auto Task Force” and over 120,000 dealership employees lost their jobs.  Even the head of Obama’s “Auto Task Force” admitted that closing the dealerships was unnecessary because the dealerships were not even owned by the automakers.  Many of those family owned dealerships are in financial ruin because of Obama’s decision.)
  5. Supporting Women And Families And Reducing The Number Of Women Seeking Abortions
    1. President Obama has fought to protect critical social
      safety net programs that support women and families
      against cuts advocated by Mitt Romney and the Ryan
      Republican budget.  (He promotes the HHS mandate (see above.)  Reducing abortions through contraception is not Catholic.  He promotes Planned Parenthood’s so-called service of abortion and he makes up services that they don’t provide like mammograms.  He supported born alive abortion.)

    The President promotes Isaiah 5:20, not human dignity or the common good.

    O Holy Spirit, strengthen us to defend all that is holy.

    Peter L. Hodges Sr

A study on the abused concept of “social justice” to be held May 12 in St. Pete, FL

This study on social justice is being held by Dr. McKalip, a Catholic man in the St. Petersburg, Florida.  He became concerned about an Alinsky-styled “community organization” in his area called F.A.S.T.  We posted a story about this previously (HERE.)

Dr. McKalip’s Study on Social Justice and Morality will occur at:

  • “Start To Finish Spine Care”, adjacent to Founders Corner at 431 Southwest BLVD N, ST. Petersburg Florida (SW corner of 4th St N and 62nd Ave. N, in between Washington and Jefferson Circles)
  • 10am-12pm, 5/12 and 5/26
  •  lunch will be served
  • RSVP here: dmckalip@neuro3.net

See the original post for this class (HERE.)  Be sure to share this information with friends you have in the Tampa Bay area (Clearwater, Tampa, St. Petersburg, Pinellas County, Hillsborough County)

Peter L. Hodges Sr.

Practice Spiritual Works of Mercy with persons involved in Alinsky organizing in the Church

When working to remove Alinsky inspired “socialist community organizations” from your parish and diocese, it is imperative that you have the courage to put into practice the Spiritual Works of Mercy.

 

Here are The Spiritual Works of Mercy applied to persons involved in “socialist community organizing:”

  1. To counsel the doubtful – Show the persons involved in the “socialist community organization” (SCO) that they are following two contradictory propositions.  Atheism and Catholicism.
  2. To instruct the ignorant – Show the persons involved that they were manipulated into participating in the SCO in their parish.
  3. To admonish sinners – Show the persons involved in the SCO that its principles are atheistic and sinful, and thus contrary to Catholicism.  Ask the persons to leave the SCO as well as to work to have it removed from their parish and diocese.
  4. To comfort the afflicted – Give encouragement, support and assistance to the persons who are tired from defending the Church, their family and society from the errors of the SCO.
  5. To forgive offenses – Make clear to the persons involved in the SCO that you will be welcoming to them when their involvement in the SCO has ceased.
  6. To bear wrongs patiently – The authority to remove the SCO from the diocese belongs to your bishop.  Your bishop will discern the SCO’s consistency with Catholic Social Teaching (CST.)  However, he will be assured by the persons involved in the SCO that its principles are consistent with CST though this is impossible.  He will have much information to wade through in this regard.  Do not lose hope due to a lengthy discernment or even an acceptance of the SCO by your bishop. Remember your duty as a lay person.
  7. To pray for the living and the dead – All of those affected by the error of the SCO will need the help of the one true God.  Without him we can do nothing.

O Holy Spirit, strengthen us to defend all that is holy.

Peter L. Hodges Sr.